朝5晚9

China rejects EU’s ‘unlawful’ extraterritorial overreach in JD.com probe; move signals Beijing’s resolve to safeguard its interests: expert_我的网站

A |     AI摘要      福州金山大道主线高架桥建成开放，全长3.16公里，构建复合型交通体系助力缓堵。其分离式双幅设计兼顾采光与美学，形成独特“城市几何长廊”，实现功能与景观融合。         午后三点半，金山大道高架桥下，阳光从两幅主梁之间的空隙中斜洒下来，落在附近的草坪上。一重又一重拱形盖梁向前延伸，形成极具设计感的纵深空间，吸引路人拿出手机定格“城市几何长廊”。

B |     

China's Ministry of Justice Photo: VCG
China on Wednesday determined that the EU's cross-border investigative practices targeting Chinese entities in its probe into JD.com under the Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR) constituted unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction, and said it is barring organizations and individuals from implementing or assisting with the measures.
This statement was made by China's Ministry of Justice (MOJ), together with the Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) and other relevant departments. The announcement takes effect immediately.
The finding follows an investigation conducted pursuant to Articles 3 and 6 of China's rules on countering foreign states' unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction measures. No organization or individual may implement or assist in implementing such measures, according to the official WeChat account of the MOJ on Wednesday evening. 
The announcement sends a clear and firm message about China's position on the EU's unilateral measures, and the bloc should carefully weigh the broader implications of pursuing such actions, including the potential costs to its own interests and China-EU economic and trade relations, a Chinese expert said. Continued use of the FSR in this manner could erode investment confidence and further strain bilateral economic ties, the expert noted.
Countering extraterritorial overreach
A spokesperson for China's MOJ on Wednesday blasted the EU's targeting of JD.com, saying the bloc had arbitrarily demanded extensive and unnecessary information located in China from Chinese entities on a cross-border basis. Such demands are improper and constitute a serious violation of the international rule of law, the spokesperson said.
To safeguard China's sovereignty, security and development interests, as well as the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese citizens, legal persons and other organizations, the Ministry of Justice, together with the Ministry of Commerce and other relevant authorities, determined in accordance with rules on countering foreign states' unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction measures that the EU's actions constituted unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction. Any organization or individual is therefore prohibited from complying with or assisting in the implementation of the measures, according to the spokesperson.
The MOJ spokesperson urged the EU to immediately correct its wrongful practices, stop abusing the Foreign Subsidies Regulation as an investigative tool, and provide a fair, just and predictable market environment for companies investing and operating in Europe. If the EU persists with such actions, China will take resolute countermeasures in accordance with law, the spokesperson said.
Chinese e-commerce giant JD.com's $2.5 billion bid for German electronics retailer Ceconomy may involve Chinese subsidies, European ‌Union competition regulators claimed, as they opened a full-scale investigation into the deal, Reuters reported on May 28.
The acquisition will allow one of China's largest retailers to expand outside its home market via Ceconomy-owned electronic products retailers MediaMarkt and Saturn, Reuters reported.
The decision by ⁠the European Commission marks its first in-depth probe of a Chinese deal under its so-called FSR.
This marks another time the rules on countering foreign states' unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction measures have been invoked since they took effect in April.
In May, the MOJ, together with MOFCOM and other relevant departments, determined after an investigation that the EU's cross border investigative practices targeting Chinese entities in its investigation into Nuctech under the FSR constituted unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction.
The latest announcement concerning the EU's unilateral move under the FSR once again reflects the Chinese government's firm position on safeguarding national sovereignty, security and legitimate rights and interests, while also representing a clear response to the EU's relevant practices, Jian Junbo, director of the Center for China-Europe Relations at Fudan University's Institute of International Studies, told the Global Times on Wednesday.
"The announcement sends a clear signal to the EU and other countries: China will not accept attempts by any country to use its domestic laws as a basis for exercising unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction over matters within China, particularly when such actions undermine China's sovereign rights and interests," said Jian.
Likewise, China will not accept attempts to unilaterally address economic and trade frictions through so-called legal instruments when doing so harms the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese companies and the Chinese market, Jian said.
Call on fair, just market
The EU's frequent use of the FSR against Chinese companies is not an isolated occurrence.
In February, the European Commission announced an in-depth investigation under the FSR into Chinese wind turbine manufacturer Goldwind.
Responding to the bloc's move, a MOFCOM spokesperson said that the EU had recently frequently used the FSR to launch investigations into Chinese companies and had escalated investigations into Chinese wind power and security equipment companies to in-depth probes, showing clear targeting and discrimination. China has expressed serious concern and strong dissatisfaction over the moves.
The MOFCOM spokesperson said the EU's investigations had broadened the concept of "foreign subsidies" and involved multiple problems, including insufficient evidence to launch investigations and a lack of transparency in procedures, describing the practices as "typical protectionism in the name of 'fair competition.'"
In January 2025, following an investigation, MOFCOM already determined in accordance with the law that the EU's relevant practices constituted trade and investment barriers. Instead of correcting its practices, the EU has gone further down the wrong path.
"China has made its position very clear, and the EU should fully consider the consequences of continuing with such measures, including their potential impact on the EU itself and on China-EU economic and trade relations," Zhang Jian, a vice president of the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations, told the Global Times on Wednesday.
If the EU continues to impose excessive restrictions on foreign companies through similar rules, it will not only raise compliance costs for multinational companies but could also undermine the competitiveness of European businesses, Zhang said, noting that the EU economy is already facing considerable challenges, while concerns over excessive regulation, bureaucracy and increasingly complex rules have also grown within Europe.
Moreover, such rules may ultimately constrain European companies as well as foreign businesses, experts noted. At a time when the EU economy is facing difficulties, adding more regulation and restrictions instead of addressing underlying problems would be akin to "drinking poison to quench thirst," potentially creating even greater problems for the European economy, Zhang said.
China and the EU are both major global economies. Chinese investment in Europe not only brings capital, but also creates jobs, strengthens supply chains, introduces new technologies and adds vitality to local markets, Jian said.
Moreover, from new-energy vehicles to air conditioners and other consumer products, Chinese companies have brought high-quality, cost-effective products to European consumers, helping meet much-needed market demand while providing consumers with greater choice.
Jian said that as China-EU cross border investment deepens, regulatory frictions are inevitable, but they should be addressed through dialogue and coordination rather than unilateral expansion of extraterritorial jurisdiction. Respect for each other's judicial sovereignty and legal boundaries is essential to stable and predictable economic and trade ties, the expert said.
。    今年建成并开放的金山大道主线高架桥，由于设计独特，能够形成“丁达尔光柱”“拱门套拱门”等景观。人们站在桥下所拍照片，“电影感”十足，彰显了城市建设过程中的“结构美学”。         金山大道主线高架桥形成极具设计感的纵深空间。记者 陈暖 摄     在沿线居民的眼中，“跑得快”是这座高架桥的第一个特点。    东西向快速通道（金山大道提升改造及绿化配套）工程西起橘园洲大桥，东至金山大桥。其中，金山大道主线高架桥是这一工程的重点内容，全长3.16公里，设置双向6车道，设计时速60公里，是一条全线无红绿灯、可快速通行的“空中主干道”。    如今，主线高架桥与沿线匝道全部开放，构建起“高架快速+地面集散+慢行友好”的复合型交通体系，助力城市缓堵保畅。    在摄影师的镜头里，“长得美”是这座高架桥的第二个特点。    “中轴线平视、低角度仰拍、侧边草坪当前景……”网络社交平台上，“运动摄影师蓝海”这样分享自己的拍摄体会。“确实很漂亮，马路宽敞干净整洁，底下还很凉快”“大片拉满”“福州越来越好了”……不少网友“跟帖”点赞。    这条“电影感长廊”的背后，是设计图纸上一个个被反复计算与优化的数据。    “以前设计高架桥，往往先考虑怎样把桥‘藏’起来；这次设计金山大道高架桥，我们试图打造具有鲜明记忆点、契合城市风貌的公共交通景观，让结构也能成为风景。”福州市政开发公司该项目相关负责人向记者道出了这座高架桥的“颜值密码”。    为了消解传统高架桥桥底那种令人窒息的压抑感，该项目采用了分离式双幅桥设计方案。两幅主梁之间预留3米宽的透光带，不仅解决了桥下采光问题，还在视觉上打破了笨重感。如此一来，流动的光影与舒展的大悬臂盖梁相互映衬，形成“移步换景”的城市景观效果。    在行车视角的处理方面，福州市规划设计研究院集团有限公司的设计团队下足了功夫。上部选用预制预应力混凝土小箱梁，梁底线条简洁利落，保持桥梁的轻盈体态；下部采用大悬臂盖梁，配合以30米为主的标准跨径，让造型统一的桥墩沿着行车方向近似等距离排列开来。    “你看这绵延的线条，多漂亮！”上述负责人说，连续有序的大悬臂盖梁能够形成纵向引导线，规整大气，韵律感十足。这种纵深透视的效果，正是摄影师们追捧的“大片感”——结构的力量感、空间的通透感、交通的速度感，在这里融为一体。

C | （记者 孙漫）。

D |

Current article:http://www.deshabisaoguonouzuo.cfd/list_hd8r2c7/thy.xls

Published on:13:13:27